Norcold LLC filed for chapter 11 in November 2025 after more than six decades in the RV refrigeration business. The 66-year-old supplier filed for bankruptcy protection in Delaware with approximately $344 million in debt, over 10,500 product liability claims stemming from a 2010 fire risk recall, and revenue that declined 82% in just four years.
The case combines a product defect that generated thousands of fire-related claims and $84 million in settlements, a technological shift away from gas absorption refrigerators, and a private equity acquisition that added debt. The stalking horse bidder—Dave Carter & Associates—was acquired by Norcold's parent company Thetford just weeks before the filing, creating an intra-company transaction that channels liabilities to a liquidating trust.
The U.S. Trustee objected to the debtor's third-party release provisions, citing the Supreme Court's Harrington v. Purdue Pharma decision.
Norcold was founded in 1959 in California and produced gas absorption refrigeration systems for the recreational vehicle industry. The company developed propane-electric refrigeration systems that could operate without shore power. In 1964, Norcold relocated its operations to Sidney, Ohio, establishing manufacturing facilities that would serve the company for nearly six decades. Through the 1970s and 1980s, Norcold supplied RV manufacturers with gas absorption refrigerators used in travel trailers, motorhomes, and fifth wheels across North America. The company expanded its Ohio footprint with an additional manufacturing facility in Gettysburg.
In 1997, Thetford Corporation—a provider of RV sanitation products including portable toilets and waste treatment chemicals—acquired Norcold. The ownership structure changed in December 2021 when Monomoy Capital Partners acquired Thetford, including its Norcold subsidiary. The private equity acquisition introduced significant leverage to the capital structure, with Norcold becoming a guarantor under Thetford's financing facilities. This debt load—approximately $344 million in funded debt—became difficult to service as Norcold's revenue base declined.
By 2022, financial pressure led to a restructuring of Norcold's operations. The company closed both its Sidney and Gettysburg, Ohio manufacturing facilities, laying off over 500 employees. The company transitioned from a manufacturer to a distribution-only business, sourcing products from offshore third-party suppliers rather than producing in-house, with operations headquarters relocating to Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Year
Major Event
1959
Founded in California
1964
Relocated to Sidney, Ohio
1997
Acquired by Thetford Corporation
December 2021
Monomoy Capital acquires Thetford
2022
Ohio plants closed; 500+ laid off
November 2025
Chapter 11 filing
The 2010 Product Recall: Fire Risk and Mass Tort
Norcold's gas absorption refrigeration units contained a cooling system flaw that created fire risk—boiler tube corrosion in the cooling units could allow flammable refrigerant gas to leak, potentially igniting and causing fires in RVs. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued Recall Campaign 10V563 in 2010, covering the 1200 Series models (1200, 1201, 1210, 1211). The recall was expanded in 2011 under Campaign 11V074 to include additional models, eventually encompassing the N8 Series, N6 Series, and various other configurations spanning years of production. Reports of RV fires linked to Norcold refrigerators accumulated over the following years, with fire risk allegations spawning individual lawsuits and class actions.
In 2016, Norcold reached a $36 million class action settlement related to the cooling unit defect, providing compensation for refrigerator repair and replacement costs to affected owners. The settlement was uninsured—paid from company operations rather than covered by product liability insurance policies. The class action settlement did not resolve individual fire and injury claims, which continued to accumulate; class action allegations included claims that Norcold had concealed the defect and that the recall remedies were ineffective.
By the November 2025 bankruptcy filing, over 10,500 product liability claims had been filed against Norcold, with total settlements paid since the 2010 recall approximating $84 million. The mass tort liability created an ongoing cash drain and contingent liability overhang—new claims continued to flow as fire incidents accumulated, and the tail of liability extended for years as RVs with recalled refrigerators remained in service.
Year
Product Liability Event
2010
NHTSA recall issued (Campaign 10V563)
2011
Expanded recall (Campaign 11V074)
2016
$36 million class action settlement
2010-2025
$84 million total settlements
At Filing
10,500+ claims pending
Technology Disruption: The Shift to DC Compressor
Norcold's gas absorption technology faced competition from DC compressor refrigeration. Traditional gas absorption units operated on propane and 120V AC power, using heat from propane combustion or electric heating elements to drive an absorption cooling cycle. DC compressor units operate on 12V DC power from RV batteries, using compressor-based cooling similar to residential refrigerators, with lower fire risk, higher energy efficiency, smaller form factors, and compatibility with lithium battery and solar power systems.
The technology transition that began around 2018 accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic as RV demand increased. New market entrants offered DC compressor products, and RV manufacturers accelerated their own technology transitions. The result was a market shift that reduced demand for gas absorption units. According to the First Day Declaration, the company failed to pivot its product line quickly enough to capture the DC compressor opportunity; while Norcold did offer some DC compressor products, its market position had been built on gas absorption technology.
As RV manufacturers switched suppliers, Norcold's market share declined. The company retained some aftermarket revenue from the installed base of gas absorption refrigerators requiring replacement parts and service, but this revenue stream declined as older RVs aged out of the fleet. New RV production increasingly specified DC compressor units from competitors, shrinking Norcold's addressable OEM market. Gas absorption technology shifted to a smaller aftermarket segment of new RV production.
Financial Collapse
Norcold's net revenue in 2021—the year of Monomoy's acquisition of Thetford—reached approximately $153 million. By the end of 2023, revenue had declined over 60% from the prior year. Projected 2025 revenue fell below $28 million, representing an 82% decline from the 2021 peak in four years. The company sustained cumulative net losses throughout this period, and cost reduction measures—including the plant closures and workforce reductions—did not offset the revenue decline.
Year
Net Revenue
Notes
2021
~$153 million
Peak (post-Monomoy acquisition)
2022
Declining
Plant closures initiated
2023
~60% below 2022
Accelerating decline
2025 (proj.)
<$28 million
82% below 2021
Norcold's capital structure was designed for higher revenue levels. The 2021 Financing Agreement established a term loan of approximately $312 million plus a revolving credit facility of up to $32.5 million, for total funded debt of approximately $344 million, with Cerberus Business Finance Agency, LLC serving as administrative agent. As a guarantor under its parent's financing facilities, Norcold bore responsibility for debt far exceeding what its revenue base could service—with projected 2025 revenue under $28 million, the company faced a debt load representing over 12x revenue.
Debt Instrument
Amount
Term Loan (2021 Financing Agreement)
~$312 million
Revolving Credit Facility
Up to $32.5 million
Total Funded Debt
~$344 million
The 2022 plant closures represented an attempt to right-size operations for reduced demand. The Sidney, Ohio facility—Norcold's home since 1964—was shuttered along with the Gettysburg plant, with over 500 employees losing their jobs as domestic manufacturing ceased entirely. The transformation to a distribution model reduced fixed costs but also eliminated manufacturing capabilities and flexibility—third-party offshore suppliers now produced what had been Norcold-manufactured products. This cost reduction did not offset the revenue decline and did not address the liability overhang from continuing product liability claims.
The DCA Transaction: Intra-Company Sale Structure
Dave Carter & Associates, Inc. (DCA) emerged as the stalking horse bidder for substantially all of Norcold's assets. The proposed transaction involves a $13 million credit bid—meaning DCA would credit the DIP financing it provided against the purchase price rather than paying new cash—with the sale transferring assets free and clear of liens and encumbrances, including product liability claims. DCA, founded in 1978, operates as an RV aftermarket distributor serving dealers, service centers, and retail customers across North America.
In October 2025—just weeks before Norcold's bankruptcy filing—Thetford acquired Dave Carter & Associates. Since Thetford owns Norcold, the stalking horse bidder became an affiliate of the debtor's parent company immediately before the chapter 11 case commenced, creating an intra-company sale structure where assets move within the Monomoy Capital / Thetford family of companies. The 363 sale separates assets (brand, products, distribution relationships) from Norcold LLC while channeling product liability claims and other unsecured obligations to a liquidating trust. Monomoy Capital Partners sponsors the transaction as the private equity sponsor behind Thetford, with the combined platform incorporating Thetford's sanitation products, DCA's aftermarket distribution, and Norcold's refrigeration brand and product lines.
The transaction preserves the Norcold brand, customer relationships, and aftermarket business under DCA ownership; channels 10,500+ product liability claims to a liquidating trust; consolidates DCA's distribution with Norcold's network and product catalog; and creates a broader RV aftermarket platform through combined DCA/Norcold operations. The credit bid structure means DCA pays effectively $13 million (the DIP loan amount) rather than new cash for Norcold's assets. Secured creditors under the prepetition financing facilities see their guarantee claims addressed through the transaction structure, while unsecured creditors and tort claimants face recovery from the liquidating trust—described in plan documents as "highly speculative."
DIP Financing
Dave Carter & Associates—simultaneously the stalking horse bidder—provides Norcold's DIP financing. The $13 million revolving credit facility described in the DIP Motion ensures the debtor has sufficient liquidity to operate through the sale process and maintain going-concern value for the auction.
Term
Details
Total Facility
$13 million
Interim Access
$6.5 million
DIP Lender
Dave Carter & Associates
Interest Rate
10% PIK
Maturity
120 days post-petition
Carve-Out
$500,000 professional fees
The DIP bears interest at 10% per annum, paid in kind monthly, with maturity occurring at the earlier of 120 days post-petition, acceleration following an event of default, or 35 days after the interim order if a final DIP order is not entered. The DIP facility carries superpriority administrative claim status, senior to all other administrative claims except the professional fee carve-out, and DCA receives a first priority priming lien on all prepetition collateral. The carve-out preserves $500,000 for allowed professional fees post-trigger notice, plus U.S. Trustee fees and $25,000 for a potential chapter 7 trustee. Cash collateral usage is authorized per an approved budget with 20% permitted variance on a rolling four-week basis.
By providing DIP financing, DCA establishes a secured claim that can be credit bid in the 363 sale—the $13 million DIP converts directly to purchase price consideration. The court entered the Interim DIP Order on November 4, 2025, followed by the Final DIP Order on December 16, 2025.
Plan of Liquidation and Creditor Treatment
Norcold filed a chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation rather than a reorganization plan. The company will not emerge from bankruptcy as an ongoing enterprise—instead, assets transfer to DCA (or an alternative bidder if one emerges) as the 66-year-old appliance company pursues liquidation, and remaining estate assets and claims vest in a liquidating trust for distribution to creditors and resolution of outstanding claims. The liquidating trust receives $500,000 as a wind-down amount to fund administration and claims processing, with key plan features including broad third-party releases and exculpation provisions that face U.S. Trustee challenge as discussed below.
The plan establishes eight classes with treatment ranging from full recovery to cancellation:
Class
Claim Type
Treatment
Est. Recovery
1
Other Priority Claims
Paid in full
100%
2
Other Secured Claims
Paid in full, collateral, or reinstated
100%
3
Prepetition Loan Guarantee Claims
Assumed by Purchaser or paid from proceeds
Variable
4
General Unsecured Claims (~$4M)
Pro rata share of Liquidating Trust
0.01%-100%
5
Litigation Claims (10,500+ claims)
Pro rata Trust + Insurance rights
0.01%-100%
6
Intercompany Claims (~$1.9M)
Cancelled
0%
7
Section 510(b) Claims
Cancelled
0%
8
Equity Interests
Cancelled
0%
The Disclosure Statement acknowledges that recovery estimates for Classes 4 and 5 are "highly speculative." General unsecured creditors—primarily vendors, warranty claimants, and tax authorities—hold approximately $4 million in claims competing for limited trust assets. The 10,500+ product liability claims represent the most complex creditor constituency; Class 5 Litigation Claims receive pro rata interests in the liquidating trust plus whatever insurance policy proceeds remain available. Insurance coverage is key to tort claimant recovery, as the trust itself may hold limited non-insurance assets after administrative expenses. The practical recovery for fire and injury claimants depends heavily on available insurance limits, coverage disputes, and the allocation of trust assets across over 10,000 claimants.
U.S. Trustee Objection: Third-Party Release Challenge
The U.S. Trustee filed an objection to Norcold's disclosure statement raising significant concerns about the plan's third-party release provisions. The objection cites the Supreme Court's decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., which restricted the circumstances under which bankruptcy courts may approve non-consensual third-party releases. The U.S. Trustee argues that the disclosure statement provides inadequate information about the releases and that the plan's release structure is improperly non-consensual—under traditional release analysis following Purdue, silence cannot constitute consent to release claims, a direct challenge to plans that deem creditors to have consented to releases by not voting against the plan.
The U.S. Trustee's objection affects plan confirmation timing. The disclosure statement hearing was adjourned to January 13, 2026 to address objections, and resolution may require plan modifications to implement opt-in or opt-out release mechanisms that satisfy post-Purdue requirements. If the court sides with the U.S. Trustee, Norcold may need to revise its release provisions, potentially affecting negotiations with released parties (including current and former officers, directors, and affiliated entities).
Case Timeline
The Norcold case proceeds on a timeline targeting approximately 90 days from filing to sale closing:
Date
Event
1959
Norcold founded in California
1964
Relocated to Sidney, Ohio
1997
Acquired by Thetford Corporation
2010
NHTSA product recall issued (fire risk)
2016
$36 million class action settlement
2018
RV OEMs begin shift to DC compressor technology
December 2021
Monomoy Capital acquires Thetford (including Norcold)
2022
Ohio plants closed; 500+ employees laid off
October 2025
Thetford acquires Dave Carter & Associates
November 3, 2025
Petition Date
November 4, 2025
First Day Hearing; Interim DIP Order
December 9, 2025
Bar Date Order (January 23, 2026 general bar date)
U.S. Trustee Objection to Disclosure Statement Filed
December 16, 2025
Final DIP Order
January 13, 2026
Disclosure Statement Hearing (adjourned)
January 15, 2026
Bid Deadline
January 20, 2026
Auction (if needed)
January 23, 2026
General Bar Date
RV Industry Context
Norcold's bankruptcy occurred amid RV industry volatility. The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a surge in RV demand as consumers sought outdoor recreation alternatives to air travel and hotel stays, with production years 2020 and 2021 seeing record shipments as manufacturers expanded capacity. By 2022-2023, demand normalized and excess capacity emerged, and the RV supplier base faced consolidation pressure as volumes declined from pandemic peaks.
The technology shift from gas absorption to DC compressor refrigeration aligns with broader trends in RV design. Modern RV buyers prioritize energy efficiency, solar power compatibility, and lithium battery systems for off-grid camping ("boondocking"). DC compressor refrigeration integrates with these electrical systems, while gas absorption technology remains tied to propane consumption and 120V requirements.
The 10,500+ product liability claims will be channeled to the liquidating trust for resolution, with insurance policies representing the primary recovery source for tort claimants and trust assets providing a supplemental pool. Claimants with pending litigation against Norcold will have their claims channeled through the bankruptcy process, subject to the automatic stay and trust claims procedures.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Norcold file for bankruptcy?
Norcold faced product liability and technology disruption. The 2010 fire risk recall generated over 10,500 claims and $84 million in settlements. The RV industry's shift to DC compressor refrigeration reduced demand for gas absorption technology. Revenue declined 82%—from $153 million in 2021 to under $28 million projected in 2025—while debt remained at $344 million.
What happens to my Norcold refrigerator warranty?
Dave Carter & Associates (the buyer) is expected to continue the Norcold brand and aftermarket business. Replacement parts and service should remain available. Existing warranty claims against Norcold LLC may be treated as general unsecured claims in bankruptcy with uncertain recovery. Monitor case developments for announcements regarding warranty assumption by the purchaser.
Who is buying Norcold?
Dave Carter & Associates, a major RV aftermarket distributor, is the stalking horse bidder. However, Thetford—Norcold's parent company—acquired DCA in October 2025, just weeks before the filing. This creates an intra-company transaction where assets effectively remain within the Monomoy Capital / Thetford family of companies while shedding Norcold's liability.
What recovery will creditors receive?
Priority and secured claims receive full recovery. General unsecured claims (approximately $4 million) and litigation claims (10,500+ product liability claims) receive pro rata interests in the liquidating trust, with recovery described as "highly speculative" and estimated at 0.01%-100%. Product liability claimants also have claims against insurance policies. Equity interests receive nothing.
What was the 2010 recall about?
Norcold's gas absorption refrigerators contained a cooling unit defect where boiler tube corrosion could allow flammable gas to leak, causing fires in RVs. NHTSA issued recalls in 2010 and 2011 covering the 1200 Series, N8 Series, N6 Series, and related models. The defect generated thousands of fire reports and injury claims.
Why did RV manufacturers stop buying from Norcold?
The RV industry transitioned from gas absorption to DC compressor refrigeration beginning around 2018. DC compressor technology offers lower fire risk, better energy efficiency, and compatibility with lithium batteries and solar power systems. As OEMs switched to DC compressor suppliers, Norcold's market share eroded and the company failed to pivot its product line quickly enough.
What happened to Norcold's factories?
Both the Sidney, Ohio and Gettysburg, Ohio manufacturing facilities closed in 2022, with over 500 employees laid off. Norcold transitioned from a manufacturer to a distribution-only business model, sourcing products from offshore third-party suppliers. The plant closures ended nearly 60 years of Ohio manufacturing.
How does the Thetford/DCA acquisition relate to the bankruptcy?
Thetford—owned by Monomoy Capital Partners—acquired DCA in October 2025, weeks before Norcold's November 3 filing. DCA then emerged as both DIP lender and stalking horse bidder. This creates an intra-company transaction where Norcold's assets transfer within the Thetford family while liability is channeled to a liquidating trust.
How long will the bankruptcy take?
The case targets approximately 90 days from filing to sale closing. Key dates: Bid Deadline January 15, 2026; Auction (if needed) January 20, 2026; Sale Hearing January 28, 2026; Target Closing February 12, 2026. However, the U.S. Trustee's objection to third-party releases could extend the timeline if plan modifications are required.
Will Norcold continue as a brand?
Yes—DCA is expected to continue the Norcold brand for aftermarket refrigerators, parts, and accessories. The service network is expected to remain operational for existing RV owners. Norcold LLC itself will liquidate, and domestic manufacturing is not anticipated.
Who is the claims agent for Norcold?
Stretto, Inc. serves as the claims and noticing agent. The court-authorized role in this case anchors creditor notices and claims-register administration to the filed retention and noticing record.
For ongoing bankruptcy case analysis and restructuring intelligence across the manufacturing sector, visit the ElevenFlo bankruptcy blog.
objection to Norcold's disclosure statement /documents/906ec4ab-cb90-4c74-ac77-b8b4bd515dfc/
Bidding Procedures Order /documents/81e2bf33-5484-4229-927a-fb27e2f995fd/
66-year-old supplier filed for bankruptcy protection https://rvbusiness.com/66-year-old-supplier-norcold-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy/
acquired by Norcold's parent company Thetford just weeks before the filing https://www.mcpfunds.com/news/monomoy-backed-thetford-expands-rv-distribution-capabilities-with-acquisition-of-dave-carter-associates/
closed both its Sidney and Gettysburg, Ohio manufacturing facilities https://www.daytondailynews.com/local/local-manufacturer-will-close-two-plants-laying-off-358-workers/NSDGFU46XBFATE5X4MZL2VSUNQ/
relocating to Ann Arbor, Michigan https://whatnow.com/detroit/local-news/a-michigan-manufacturer-enters-chapter-11-bankruptcy-proceedings/
Recall Campaign 10V563 in 2010 https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2010/RCMN-10V563-0124.pdf
expanded in 2011 under Campaign 11V074 https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2011/RCMN-11V074-8970.pdf
fire risk allegations https://www.rvtravel.com/norcold-fridge-at-center-of-camping-world-rv-fire-lawsuit/
$36 million class action settlement https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/closed-settlements/norcold-rv-refrigerator-defect-class-action-settlement/
class action allegations https://www.bigclassaction.com/lawsuit/norcold-class-action-rv-boat-refrigerators-class.php
failed to pivot its product line quickly enough https://rvfridgeguys.com/norcold-technical-blog/norcold-files-chapter-11-bankruptcy-the-real-story-and-what-you-need-to-know/
revenue had declined over 60% https://news.bloomberglaw.com/bankruptcy-law/norcold-llc-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy-in-delaware
established a term loan of approximately $312 million plus a revolving credit facility of up to $32.5 million https://www.law360.com/articles/2406924
Dave Carter & Associates, Inc. (DCA) emerged as the stalking horse bidder https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251103099618/en/Norcold-LLC-Initiates-Voluntary-U.S.-Chapter-11-Case-to-Facilitate-Sale-of-Its-Assets
Thetford acquired Dave Carter & Associates https://finance.yahoo.com/news/thetford-dave-carter-associates-combine-210000756.html
creates a broader RV aftermarket platform https://moderncampground.com/usa/thetford-expands-rv-supply-reach-with-acquisition-of-dave-carter-associates
66-year-old appliance company pursues liquidation https://www.thestreet.com/automotive/66-year-old-appliance-company-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy
Thetford's expansion through the DCA acquisition https://rv-pro.com/news/thetford-acquires-dave-carter-associates/
announced in October 2025 https://rvbusiness.com/thetford-announces-acquisition-of-dave-carter-associates/
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC (Richard Wu) https://usaherald.com/norcold-filed-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy/
The service network supporting Norcold products is expected to continue operating https://www.rvtrader.com/blog/2025/11/20/fridge-maker-norcold-files-for-bankruptcy/
This article was researched and written with AI assistance, using court filings, public records, and news sources. AI-generated content can contain errors. Verify all information against primary sources before relying on it. This is not legal or financial advice. See the disclaimer.